Asylum Tracker — US asylum statistics from public EOIR, USCIS and ICE data

Belarus: Asylum Approval Rates and Decisions in US Immigration Courts

267 asylum merits decisions; 64.0% granted (2025-09 to 2026-08). Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

How we estimate

EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.

Asylum approval rate in US courts

Belarus has 267 recorded asylum merits decisions in 2025-09 to 2026-08.

The merits grant rate is 64.0%: grants divided by grants plus denials.

Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

Metric
Asylum merits grant rate
Value
64.0%
Sample size
267
Period
2025-09 to 2026-08
Source
EOIR FOIA case data
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026
Data through: Aug 2026Source published: Sep 1, 2026Source updated: Sep 1, 2026Imported: Oct 4, 2026 Source: EOIR FOIA case data Methodology and limitations Public API

Cite this page: Belarus Asylum Approval Rates in US Immigration Courts. https://asylumstats.com/nationalities/belarus-bz. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.

Grants and denials by period

Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
Decision trend
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
1997 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1998 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1999 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2000 0 3 3 0.0%
2001 4 5 9 44.4%
2002 5 4 9 55.6%
2003 13 7 20 65.0%
2004 15 5 20 75.0%
2005 47 26 73 64.4%
2006 54 30 84 64.3%
2007 37 21 58 63.8%
2008 46 14 60 76.7%
2009 46 11 57 80.7%
2010 50 15 65 76.9%
2011 52 11 63 82.5%
2012 42 16 58 72.4%
2013 57 7 64 89.1%
2014 34 11 45 75.6%
2015 23 6 29 79.3%
2016 19 2 21 90.5%
2017 21 0 21 100.0%
2018 39 11 50 78.0%
2019 42 9 51 82.3%
2020 21 8 29 72.4%
2021 68 9 77 88.3%
2022 175 12 187 93.6%
2023 284 27 311 91.3%
2024 272 45 317 85.8%
2025 269 54 323 83.3%
2026 109 70 179 60.9%
Representation breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Represented 166 85 251 66.1%
Not represented 5 11 16 31.2%
Custody breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Never detained 143 59 202 70.8%
Detained 18 35 53 34.0%
Released 10 2 12 83.3%

Courts with recorded decisions

Courts with recorded decisions

Methods and limitations

What is the asylum grant rate for Belarus?

267 asylum merits decisions; 64.0% granted (2025-09 to 2026-08). Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

How do asylum grant rates vary by country?

Our nationality directory compares EOIR asylum merits decisions by the nationality recorded in court data. Use the same period and sample floor for comparisons. Nationality does not determine an individual outcome.

Which courts have the most recorded decisions for Belarus?

Philadelphia Immigration Court; Chicago Immigration Court; Orlando Immigration Court. These are leading courts by merits-decision count in the page’s period, not recommendations about venue or individual outcomes.

Why is a grant rate or ranking missing?

We display a rate only with at least 2 merits decisions and rank judges or court comparisons only with at least 30. Small samples can vary widely. A missing rate is not a zero grant rate.