Immigration Judge Wade Thomas Napier (WTN): Historical Asylum Approval Rates
These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code WTN, labeled Wade Thomas Napier in the imported lookup. 659 asylum merits decisions; 19.9% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.
How we estimate
EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.
EOIR code and recorded identity
EOIR judge code WTN, labeled Wade Thomas Napier in the imported lookup, has 659 recorded asylum merits decisions in All available decision history.
The merits grant rate is 19.9%: grants divided by grants plus denials.
Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.
- Metric
- Asylum merits grant rate
- Value
- 19.9%
- Sample size
- 659
- Period
- All available decision history
- Source
- EOIR FOIA case data
- Last updated
- Oct 4, 2026
These statistics are attributed to EOIR judge code WTN. Historical code records and court assignments are not a verified biography or proof of personal tenure.
Cite this page: Wade Thomas Napier (WTN): Immigration Judge Asylum Rates. https://asylumstats.com/judges/wade-thomas-napier-wtn. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.
Historical asylum decisions
Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2009 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2010 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2011 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2013 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2014 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2017 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2018 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2020 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
| 2021 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 32.3% |
| 2022 | 29 | 40 | 69 | 42.0% |
| 2023 | 25 | 49 | 74 | 33.8% |
| 2024 | 44 | 55 | 99 | 44.4% |
| 2025 | 18 | 159 | 177 | 10.2% |
| 2026 | 5 | 204 | 209 | 2.4% |
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Represented | 129 | 477 | 606 | 21.3% |
| Not represented | 2 | 51 | 53 | 3.8% |
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never detained | 99 | 421 | 520 | 19.0% |
| Released | 30 | 64 | 94 | 31.9% |
| Detained | 2 | 43 | 45 | 4.4% |
| Unknown | 0 | 0 | 0 | Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2). |
Courts recorded for this code
Courts recorded for this code
- Baltimore Immigration Court
- Charlotte Immigration Court
- Boston Immigration Court
- Hyattsville Immigration Court
- Lumpkin Immigration Court
- Annandale Immigration Court (WAS)
- Jena Immigration Court
- Conroe Immigration Court
- Pearsall Immigration Court
- Oakdale Immigration Court
- Chelmsford Immigration Court (CHE)
- Aurora Immigration Court
- Elizabeth Immigration Court
- Sterling
- West Los Angeles Immigration Court (WLA)
- Los Fresnos Immigration Court (PIS)
- New York Immigration Court (NYC)
- New Orleans Immigration Court
- Houston Immigration Court (HOU)
- Harlingen Immigration Court
- San Antonio Immigration Court
- Chicago Immigration Court
- Houston Immigration Court (HSG)
- Philadelphia Immigration Court
- Fort Snelling Immigration Court
- Buffalo Immigration Court
- San Diego Immigration Court
- Detroit Immigration Court
- Los Fresnos Immigration Court (PEP)
- Omaha Immigration Court
- Eloy Immigration Court
- Houston Immigration Court (HGP)
- Imperial Immigration Court
- Orlando Immigration Court
- Portland Immigration Court (POR)
- Dallas Immigration Court
- West Valley Immigration Court
- Florence Immigration Court
- Santa Ana Immigration Court
- Newark Immigration Court
- Annandale Immigration Court (ANN)
- Denver Immigration Court
Courts recorded for this code
Courts recorded for this code
Guides
What the history can show
What is the asylum grant rate for Wade Thomas Napier?
These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code WTN, labeled Wade Thomas Napier in the imported lookup. 659 asylum merits decisions; 19.9% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.
What does this EOIR judge code identify?
The imported lookup labels code WTN as Wade Thomas Napier. Court records describe activity attributed to that code, not verified personal tenure or a current assignment.
Does a judge’s past grant rate predict my case?
No. These are observational statistics attributed to EOIR judge codes, not a prediction or assessment of a named person’s entire career. Case mix, period, representation and custody can differ. For individual advice, consult a qualified legal representative.
Why is a grant rate or ranking missing?
We display a rate only with at least 2 merits decisions and rank judges or court comparisons only with at least 30. Small samples can vary widely. A missing rate is not a zero grant rate.