Asylum Tracker — US asylum statistics from public EOIR, USCIS and ICE data

Immigration Judge Shadee M. Star (SMS): Historical Asylum Approval Rates

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code SMS, labeled Shadee M. Star in the imported lookup. 1,333 asylum merits decisions; 51.5% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

How we estimate

EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.

EOIR code and recorded identity

EOIR judge code SMS, labeled Shadee M. Star in the imported lookup, has 1,333 recorded asylum merits decisions in All available decision history.

The merits grant rate is 51.5%: grants divided by grants plus denials.

Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

Metric
Asylum merits grant rate
Value
51.5%
Sample size
1,333
Period
All available decision history
Source
EOIR FOIA case data
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026

These statistics are attributed to EOIR judge code SMS. Historical code records and court assignments are not a verified biography or proof of personal tenure.

Data through: Aug 2026Source published: Sep 1, 2026Source updated: Sep 1, 2026Imported: Oct 4, 2026 Source: EOIR FOIA case data Methodology and limitations Public API

Cite this page: Shadee M. Star (SMS): Immigration Judge Asylum Rates. https://asylumstats.com/judges/shadee-m-star-sms. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.

Historical asylum decisions

Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
Decision trend
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
1986 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1987 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1988 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1989 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1990 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1991 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1992 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1993 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1994 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1995 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1996 0 3 3 0.0%
1997 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1998 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1999 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2000 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2001 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2002 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2003 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2004 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2005 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2006 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2007 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2008 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2009 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2010 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2011 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2012 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2013 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2014 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2015 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2016 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2017 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2018 4 8 12 33.3%
2019 174 86 260 66.9%
2020 106 43 149 71.1%
2021 85 46 131 64.9%
2022 134 85 219 61.2%
2023 113 48 161 70.2%
2024 43 62 105 41.0%
2025 25 140 165 15.2%
2026 2 124 126 1.6%
Representation breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Represented 671 569 1,240 54.1%
Not represented 15 78 93 16.1%
Custody breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Never detained 369 389 758 48.7%
Released 316 210 526 60.1%
Detained 1 48 49 2.0%

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

What the history can show

What is the asylum grant rate for Shadee M. Star?

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code SMS, labeled Shadee M. Star in the imported lookup. 1,333 asylum merits decisions; 51.5% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

What does this EOIR judge code identify?

The imported lookup labels code SMS as Shadee M. Star. Court records describe activity attributed to that code, not verified personal tenure or a current assignment.

Does a judge’s past grant rate predict my case?

No. These are observational statistics attributed to EOIR judge codes, not a prediction or assessment of a named person’s entire career. Case mix, period, representation and custody can differ. For individual advice, consult a qualified legal representative.

Why is a grant rate or ranking missing?

We display a rate only with at least 2 merits decisions and rank judges or court comparisons only with at least 30. Small samples can vary widely. A missing rate is not a zero grant rate.