Asylum Tracker — US asylum statistics from public EOIR, USCIS and ICE data

Alice Song Hartye (ASH): 34.0% Asylum Grant Rate

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code ASH, labeled Alice Song Hartye in the imported lookup. 1,121 asylum merits decisions; 34.0% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.

How we estimate

EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.

Key facts

EOIR judge code ASH, labeled Alice Song Hartye in the imported lookup, has 1,121 recorded asylum merits decisions in All available decision history.

The merits grant rate is 34.0%: grants divided by grants plus denials.

Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.

Metric
Asylum merits grant rate
Value
34.0%
Sample size
1,121
Period
All available decision history
Source
EOIR FOIA case data
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026

These statistics are attributed to EOIR judge code ASH. Historical code records and court assignments are not a verified biography or proof of personal tenure.

Data through: Aug 2026Source published: Sep 1, 2026Source updated: Sep 1, 2026Imported: Oct 4, 2026 Source: EOIR FOIA case data Methodology and limitations Public API

Cite this page: Alice Song Hartye (ASH): 34.0% Asylum Grant Rate. https://asylumstats.com/judges/alice-song-hartye-ash. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.

Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
Decision trend
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
1990 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1991 0 2 2 0.0%
1992 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1993 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1994 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1995 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1996 0 2 2 0.0%
1997 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1998 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1999 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2001 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2002 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2003 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2004 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2005 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2006 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2007 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2008 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2009 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2010 0 2 2 0.0%
2011 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2012 0 2 2 0.0%
2013 0 2 2 0.0%
2014 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2015 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2016 1 0 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2017 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2018 2 25 27 7.4%
2019 33 94 127 26.0%
2020 4 66 70 5.7%
2021 13 71 84 15.5%
2022 85 23 108 78.7%
2023 102 21 123 82.9%
2024 78 23 101 77.2%
2025 30 162 192 15.6%
2026 33 235 268 12.3%
Representation breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Represented 353 505 858 41.1%
Not represented 28 235 263 10.6%
Custody breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Never detained 260 421 681 38.2%
Detained 31 261 292 10.6%
Released 90 58 148 60.8%
Courts recorded for this judge code
Other judges at the comparison court
Leading nationalities by decisions

Frequently asked questions

What is the asylum grant rate for Alice Song Hartye?

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code ASH, labeled Alice Song Hartye in the imported lookup. 1,121 asylum merits decisions; 34.0% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.

How long does the asylum process take?

Completed claims with recorded filing and decision dates averaged 647 days from filing to decision; this is not a forecast for pending cases. The data cannot predict how long a pending case will take. Court proceedings, USCIS interviews and green-card processing are different processes.

Which nationalities have the most decisions for Alice Song Hartye?

Honduras; El Salvador; Guatemala. Counts reflect the page’s reporting period and the EOIR nationality codes, which include historical categories.

Does a judge’s past grant rate predict my case?

No. These are observational statistics attributed to EOIR judge codes, not a prediction or assessment of a named person’s entire career. Case mix, period, representation and custody can differ. For individual advice, consult a qualified legal representative.

Why is a grant rate or ranking missing?

We display a rate only with at least 2 merits decisions and rank judges or court comparisons only with at least 30. Small samples can vary widely. A missing rate is not a zero grant rate.

How can I check my immigration court case?

Use EOIR Automated Case Information for court case details and rely on official notices. Use USCIS Case Status Online for USCIS receipt numbers. These aggregate statistics do not look up individual cases.