Asylum Tracker — US asylum statistics from public EOIR, USCIS and ICE data

Immigration Judge Alberto E. Gonzalez (AEG): Historical Asylum Approval Rates

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code AEG, labeled Alberto E. Gonzalez in the imported lookup. 1,647 asylum merits decisions; 56.2% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

How we estimate

EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.

EOIR code and recorded identity

EOIR judge code AEG, labeled Alberto E. Gonzalez in the imported lookup, has 1,647 recorded asylum merits decisions in All available decision history.

The merits grant rate is 56.2%: grants divided by grants plus denials.

Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

Metric
Asylum merits grant rate
Value
56.2%
Sample size
1,647
Period
All available decision history
Source
EOIR FOIA case data
Last updated
Oct 4, 2026

These statistics are attributed to EOIR judge code AEG. Historical code records and court assignments are not a verified biography or proof of personal tenure.

Data through: Aug 2026Source published: Sep 1, 2026Source updated: Sep 1, 2026Imported: Oct 4, 2026 Source: EOIR FOIA case data Methodology and limitations Public API

Cite this page: Alberto E. Gonzalez (AEG): Immigration Judge Asylum Rates. https://asylumstats.com/judges/alberto-e-gonzalez-aeg. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.

Historical asylum decisions

Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
Decision trend
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
1985 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1986 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1987 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1988 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1989 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1990 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1991 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1992 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1993 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1994 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
1995 55 52 107 51.4%
1996 61 73 134 45.5%
1997 44 61 105 41.9%
1998 63 67 130 48.5%
1999 66 41 107 61.7%
2000 95 39 134 70.9%
2001 124 31 155 80.0%
2002 104 52 156 66.7%
2003 144 126 270 53.3%
2004 125 132 257 48.6%
2005 44 46 90 48.9%
2006 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2007 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2008 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2009 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2010 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2011 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2012 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2013 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2014 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2015 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2016 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2017 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2018 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2019 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2020 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2021 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2022 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2023 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2024 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2025 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
2026 0 0 0 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).
Representation breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Represented 795 475 1,270 62.6%
Not represented 130 247 377 34.5%
Custody breakdown
GroupGrantsDenialsMerits decisionsAsylum merits grant rate
Never detained 840 624 1,464 57.4%
Released 55 56 111 49.6%
Detained 30 41 71 42.2%
Unknown 0 1 1 Too few decisions to report a rate (minimum 2).

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

Courts recorded for this code

What the history can show

What is the asylum grant rate for Alberto E. Gonzalez?

These decision records are attributed to EOIR judge code AEG, labeled Alberto E. Gonzalez in the imported lookup. 1,647 asylum merits decisions; 56.2% granted (All available decision history). Historical code records are not verified personal tenure. Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Historical EOIR decisions do not predict an individual case. Judge-code history is not verified personal tenure.

What does this EOIR judge code identify?

The imported lookup labels code AEG as Alberto E. Gonzalez. Court records describe activity attributed to that code, not verified personal tenure or a current assignment.

Does a judge’s past grant rate predict my case?

No. These are observational statistics attributed to EOIR judge codes, not a prediction or assessment of a named person’s entire career. Case mix, period, representation and custody can differ. For individual advice, consult a qualified legal representative.

Why is a grant rate or ranking missing?

We display a rate only with at least 2 merits decisions and rank judges or court comparisons only with at least 30. Small samples can vary widely. A missing rate is not a zero grant rate.