Pearsall (PSD): Asylum Statistics
1,219 asylum merits decisions; 5.7% granted (2025-09 to 2026-08). Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.
How we estimate
EOIR grant rate means grants divided by grants plus denials for asylum merits decisions, excluding other closures. Rates require at least 2 decisions; rankings require at least 30. Proceedings history can extend to 1951; the first recorded asylum merits month in this import is Dec 1972. Each dataset states its own coverage. Do not interpret proceedings coverage as asylum decision coverage. Reconstructed pending counts may differ from agency totals. Historical judge-code attribution is not verified personal tenure.
Key facts
Pearsall has 1,219 recorded asylum merits decisions in 2025-09 to 2026-08.
The merits grant rate is 5.7%: grants divided by grants plus denials.
Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.
- Metric
- Asylum merits grant rate
- Value
- 5.7%
- Sample size
- 1,219
- Period
- 2025-09 to 2026-08
- Source
- EOIR FOIA case data
- Last updated
- Oct 4, 2026
Cite this page: Pearsall (PSD): Asylum Statistics. https://asylumstats.com/courts/pearsall-psd. Data through Aug 2026; source published Sep 1, 2026; imported Oct 4, 2026. Include your access date when citing.
Totals and breakdowns use the canonical page period. Court and nationality trend tables include all available decision history; other trend tables use their labeled periods. All tables apply the display floor. Interactive filters can select a different period. Empty buckets and cells below the floor have no reported rate.
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 2006 | 8 | 20 | 28 | 28.6% |
| 2007 | 58 | 79 | 137 | 42.3% |
| 2008 | 118 | 99 | 217 | 54.4% |
| 2009 | 95 | 127 | 222 | 42.8% |
| 2010 | 26 | 79 | 105 | 24.8% |
| 2011 | 38 | 172 | 210 | 18.1% |
| 2012 | 26 | 119 | 145 | 17.9% |
| 2013 | 33 | 348 | 381 | 8.7% |
| 2014 | 123 | 384 | 507 | 24.3% |
| 2015 | 241 | 432 | 673 | 35.8% |
| 2016 | 145 | 403 | 548 | 26.5% |
| 2017 | 171 | 515 | 686 | 24.9% |
| 2018 | 100 | 424 | 524 | 19.1% |
| 2019 | 96 | 491 | 587 | 16.4% |
| 2020 | 145 | 553 | 698 | 20.8% |
| 2021 | 89 | 145 | 234 | 38.0% |
| 2022 | 40 | 257 | 297 | 13.5% |
| 2023 | 60 | 667 | 727 | 8.2% |
| 2024 | 50 | 1,128 | 1,178 | 4.2% |
| 2025 | 46 | 888 | 934 | 4.9% |
| 2026 | 48 | 776 | 824 | 5.8% |
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Represented | 64 | 680 | 744 | 8.6% |
| Not represented | 5 | 470 | 475 | 1.0% |
| Group | Grants | Denials | Merits decisions | Asylum merits grant rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detained | 69 | 1,129 | 1,198 | 5.8% |
| Released | 0 | 21 | 21 | 0.0% |
Hearing calendar snapshot
Recorded next hearings have a median of Sep 2026 and a 90th percentile of Sep 2026, among 1,469 proceedings with future hearings in the Aug 2026 snapshot. Scheduled dates can change; this is not a measure of elapsed waiting time.
- Median recorded next hearing
- 2026-09
- 90th percentile recorded next hearing
- 2026-09
- Proceedings with a recorded future hearing
- 1469
Judges with decisions at this court
- Terrill, Kevin
- Rodgers, Sujata
- Ambrose, Dillon J.
- Segovia, Veronica Marie.
- Clark, Ryan J.
- Mckee, Robert R.
- Kozyra, Matthew
- Slitt, Andrew J.
- Andelin, Joseph Q.
- Tijerina, Eric J.
- Martinez, Anibal D.
- Thomas, Jason
- Marshall, Jacob
- Hayden, Michael
- Burns, John
- Habib, Fayaz
- Crossan, Thomas G., JR.
- Adams, Justin
- Greenstein, Saul E.
- Lee, Kalenna
- Graulich, James C.
- Mckee, James
- Alcorn, Stuart Douglas
- Brooks, Alicia
- Welling, Shayne M.
- Santiago, Luisa
- Tyrakoski, Meredith B.
- Addicott, Jacob T.
- Le, Huy
- Terrien, Jeb
- Attia, Olga E.
- Chavez, Linda L.
- Wilson, Rachel L.
- Hallauer, Scott F.
- Holmes-Simmons, Theresa
- Adams, Anna
- Kennedy, Brandon
- Taylor, Khalilah
- Carle, John B.
- Barnes, John C.
- Lee, Mary C.
- Palmer, Brian T.
- Day, Christopher
- Lampley-Fortson, Christa J.
- Purnell, Charles N.
- Mazza, Jennifer L.
Leading nationalities by decisions
Guides
Frequently asked questions
What is the asylum grant rate for Pearsall?
1,219 asylum merits decisions; 5.7% granted (2025-09 to 2026-08). Rates reflect the period and sample on this page. Statistics describe past decisions, not individual outcomes. Not legal advice.
How many proceedings are pending at Pearsall?
The snapshot records 1,726 pending proceedings as of Aug 2026. Pending counts are reconstructed from recorded proceeding dates and can differ from EOIR’s published totals. They do not measure the number of people or guarantee a hearing date.
What is the average wait time for an immigration hearing?
Recorded next hearings have a median of Sep 2026 and a 90th percentile of Sep 2026, among 1,469 proceedings with future hearings in the Aug 2026 snapshot. Scheduled dates can change; this is not a measure of elapsed waiting time. Backlog divided by recent monthly completions is a workload ratio, not a predicted hearing date. Check your own notice or official EOIR case information.
Where is Pearsall?
566 VETERAN DRIVE., SUITE 101 Map coordinates are approximate city locations; verify the location and hearing details with EOIR and your notice.
Which judges have recorded decisions at Pearsall?
Terrill, Kevin; Rodgers, Sujata; Ambrose, Dillon J.. See the linked judge profiles for decision counts and reporting periods. Placeholder dockets are excluded; historical recorded courts are not proof of a current assignment.
How can I check my immigration court case?
Use EOIR Automated Case Information for court case details and rely on official notices. Use USCIS Case Status Online for USCIS receipt numbers. These aggregate statistics do not look up individual cases.
What happens in a master calendar hearing?
A master calendar hearing handles procedural matters, pleadings and scheduling. It is different from the individual merits hearing. Consult EOIR’s Immigration Court Practice Manual and your hearing notice for official instructions.